oriontrainingsystems.com
  • Home
  • About
  • Coaching
    • Program Fees
    • Downloadable Programs
  • Masters Athletes
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • FAQ
  • Contact

Make Your Next 140.6 or 70.3 Even Better

8/26/2018

0 Comments

 
Given you can race a 70.3 or 140.6 year round, this article is timely regardless of the time of year.  In some respects, successfully completing a long-distance triathlon is simply an equation of “putting in the time” so that you can ensure, barring an unfortunate situation, you will be able to cross the finish line.  But, in my 25 years of coaching endurance athletes of all walks of life, I’ve seen plenty of athletes – those whom I coach as well as many whom I do not – torpedo a goal due to what boils down to a very small number of errors.  And, these mistakes are all ones that could otherwise be avoided.   Maybe you have made some (or all) of these yourself!
 
So, here is that short list of avoidable mistakes.  
 
Too Much Training 
If some moderate amount of volume and long workouts are good, then more of either -- or both! --should be even better, right?  Right!  Wrong.   
 
Regardless of my explicit instructions to my athletes, a small percentage of them seem to always think that “more is better” and do extra credit – adding more workouts to the weekly schedule or extending multiple workouts because they feel they need to or because they’re “feeling good”.  Not only is this added work unnecessary, it also goes against the well-laid out plan and also negatively impacts recovery.  While simple in premise it is also the most commonly forgotten fact –- improvement occurs during periods of recovery and not during periods of hard work.  Yet, how many endurance athletes completely ignore this?  
 
Do this once or twice, OK (I guess).  Do it often, and the result is that you will arrive at your goal race overly fatigued and, thus, not able to bring to bear all of the fitness you spent so many months building.  Stresses from training are cumulative and add up over time, so deliberate recovery days and days off are so critical to balancing all that hard work out.  Without proper – and enough – rest and recovery, you are doing yourself a disservice.   
 
Planning a Nutrition/Hydration Strategy That Works 
Long course athletes need to replenish the calories they burn and the fluids they lose during a race, and at a rate they can absorb. Learning what works and how much of it is required takes a lot of practice over many weeks.  It is deliberate work.  You would be surprised how many athletes fail to properly prepare in this area as they do in their training.  Or, how many use race day to do things completely at odds with what they practiced in training.  Failing to dial in your nutrition and hydration strategies can lead to utter disaster on race day. 

Depending on how well- trained you are and how hard you are exercising, the body has approximately 60 to 180 minutes of stored muscle glycogen to access as fuel during exercise. So, while you may need very little or no supplemental nutrition during a Sprint or Olympic Distance triathlon (or any athletic event lasting less than a couple hours), supplemental nutrition and hydration should be considered mandatory for longer training sessions and races. Very straightforward and simple guidelines are as follows:  200-300 calories and 16-24 ounces per hour.  I'm finding that decoupling nutrition and hydration on the bike leg seems to work best.  Drink water (or add a fizzy tab for a little flavor), and then take in your calories via bars or homemade "cakes" or whatever solid food works for you.  Worry less about wholesomeness and more about what sits well in your tummy.  Then, on the run, switch to gels and liquid calories -- again, whatever works well for you in training replicate in races.  

It is important to switch up the nutrition sources because, like a muscle, the receptors which help determine how to best process the calories can get overworked and fatigued, and then they shut down -- they need a break!  When this happens, bloating, nausea or worse can set in and your performance will take a nosedive regardless of your fitness.  Changing up how you get your calories minimizes this risk to a large degree (I will not say wholly).

 
Notice the above ranges.  They are ranges because every athlete is different and your own requirements can also change one long training weekend to the next.  Try different approaches and fuel sources to see what your body likes best, especially in conditions similar to those in which you will be racing.  The less you leave race day to chance, the better. 

Race-Specific Training 
There’s a saying, which I’m sure you’ve heard:  “If you don’t do it in practice, you’ll never do it in competition.”  Exactly.  Putting in enough volume is important, yes.  But, if you train slowly and then expect to race quickly, it will never happen.  And you will end up disappointed come race day.  The whole point of training is to practice what needs to happen on race day so that it actually does happen in the race.  Crazy concept, I know.  In training, come to understand the correlation between RPE (rate of perceived effort), HR (heart rate) and power (on the bike and, now, even the run) so that you know precisely what your realistic ranges are for each leg come race day.  If you train at 15mph on the bike but expect to hold 18mph come race day, that’s just not a realistic “mind over matter” expectation to set.  Testing every 4-8 weeks depending on time of year is important to track progress and also reset training zones so that you are training as realistically as you can to achieve positive race day results.   

Race Day Hype is a Killer 
So, you’ve prepared the best you can and have avoided the first 3 mistakes listed.  You’re all set to light the race on fire, right?  Not yet.  Properly preparing for race day is one thing.  Even if your lead-up to your key 70.3 or 140.6 race is spot on and you are a well-oiled (and rested) machine, there is one more, even more nefarious, obstacle standing between you and crossing the finish line in a state of euphoria rather than dejection.   

Pre-race hype is arguably the biggest black hole of energy suck on the planet.  I’m always amazed at how many athletes walk endless miles through the athlete village or race expo every day to buy more gadgets or the most recent and scientific doo-dad that will ensure a world record performance.  It is one thing to casually walk through an expo to burn a small amount of time and take your mind off the upcoming race; it’s completely another to get sucked into the buzz and allow it to leach your focus and energy, which will only serve to de-focus you from the task at hand. 

Athletes get so excited about the expo environment and being surrounded by all the other like-minded athletes, that they risk ignoring their race day plans altogether.  Sure, go to the expo.  But, make one round, buy whatever it is you want and then go ahead and use them in training – after your race is over. 

These mistakes may seem obvious and easily avoidable.  However, they are not.  Even the best athletes in the world have made these or other similar mistakes at some point.  We’re human, not infallible.  That said, being cognizant that these traps exist and can be relatively easy to fall into, allows us to better identify when we are starting to fall so we can better catch our balance and avoid the spikes at the bottom.   

In closing, remain confident in your preparation and stick to the plan you and your coach have put together for race day!
​
 
Happy Training, 
Coach Nate 
 ​
0 Comments

Breaking Through Barriers in Sport

8/19/2018

0 Comments

 
Do Psychological Breakthroughs in Sport Really Exist? 
 
I read an interesting article by Steve Magness awhile back.  Through stats and based on other world events of the era, Magness uses Roger Bannister’s breaking of the 4-minute mile to debunk the long-held belief that this was some sort of magical barrier held in place by a strong psychological “It can’t be done” mentality.  It’s an insightful read I highly recommend, so I won’t ruin it here, but I will highlight just a couple examples of what Magness conveys. 
 
The first is that WWII created a huge vacuum in performances (in this case, on the track).  Not only was most of the world at war, but men who would normally be training and racing were instead focused on the war effort.  Some number of athletes lost their lives or never returned to running post-war.  The second is that no such psychological barrier appeared to exist for events that resulted in odd timing thresholds.  For example, did anyone view 3:43 for the 1,500m as a performance barrier (3:43 is very similar to running 4:00 for the mile)?  Apparently not. 
 
Give the article a read.  Cool stuff. 
 
In any case, it made me think back to my own athletic career.  I was a competitive swimmer from age 5 through college.  Swimming, like running, is a very objective, timed sport.  But, unlike running, there is no holding back in swimming.  Swimmers don’t swim just fast enough to win their events like what occurs in many non-sprint running events.  While running (again, non-sprints) is about tactics and, more often than not, doing just enough to win the event, swimming is all about guns blazing and pedal-to-the-metal from the gun to the finish.  Swimming is all about going faster and faster every time a swimmer enters the water. 
 
There are definitive barriers in swimming events, many tied to a very 'clean' time value, but all subjective.  
Growing up, I looked at a notorious time barrier in my events and thought, “I’m going to crush that.”  Barriers at different ages were goals, not deterrents.  Those times were things I and my fellow swimmers strove to smash, not things from which we shied or feared.  What we tended to shy away from was the daily bashings it took to achieve our goals.  For once we set goals and strove to achieve them, the sport stopped being fun.  I still enjoyed swimming, otherwise I would not have competed for as long as I did or gotten up at the ass crack of dawn year round.  But the “fun factor” evaporated at a young age.  Top-level sport is a grind. 

The same can be said for events in other sports.  Take, for example, the 40k time trial on the bike.  Largely, the goal is to dip under an hour.  3 hours or 4 hours seem to be the most common time barriers to dip under for the marathon.  For the Ironman, just about any round hour time barrier can be chosen.  Why not 55:17 for the time trial, or 3:26 for the marathon, or 11:47 for the Ironman?

 
The reason, I think, that the 4-minute mile became romanticized and glorified is because it is one of the few events that has had a very even and neat barrier.  Four minutes is very clean and easy to rationalize.  Dipping below the “00” is a definitive mark that’s easy to quantify.  So is 10 seconds for the 100m dash (for men).  And, back when Banister ran, the world, especially Europe, needed something to support, something about which to get excited.  How better to inject patriotism and a renewed sense of hope and optimism into a people than through an athlete striving to accomplish something that as yet had never been achieved?  Who wouldn’t rally around that? 
 
We’ve been programmed to buy-in to the concept of “breaking through” … something.  If we’re not shattering preconceived notions of barriers, then we’re admitting we are ordinary creatures.  That we are less awesome and valuable than the pedestal on which we place the human race and its capacity for greatness.  The 4-minute barrier as a standalone metric is really nothing inherently special.  Don’t get me wrong, anyone who can break four minutes for a mile -- or an hour for the 40km TT, or 3 hours for the marathon, or 10 hours for an Ironman -- is a very, very fast athlete. 

But not mythical.  And, it stands to reason that athletes who break certain times that society or the media or some other faction imposes as a barrier upon a certain measured distance of competition in a given sport, look upon those times not as barriers but rather as goals of achievement.  
It is these goals that get said athletes out of bed day after day after day to subject themselves to endless hours of gluttonous punishment. 
 
Achievement.  Because all of the blood, sweat and tears that athletes pore into their sports has to amount to something.  Otherwise, why the heck do we subject ourselves to all the punishment?  
 
Happy Training, 
​Coach Nate 
0 Comments

Remaining Competitive Past 40

8/12/2018

0 Comments

 
On the cusp of my 50th birthday, this is a great time to reflect back on my athletic career, which began at the ripe old age of five.  Literally thrown into the deep end of the pool to follow my older siblings into the sport of swimming, my parents held no aspirations for me beyond learning how to save myself should I ever fall into a body of water deeper than I was tall.
 
I did end up sticking with swimming, and turned into a nationally-ranked swimmer from age eight through my collegiate career.  I parlayed that into a near decade-long career as a pro triathlete, focusing on the Olympic Distance and finishing with a best ranking of top American/6th overall in the ITU World Cup Series.  Along the way, I won more than a dozen races, and placed 4th, 3rd and 5th respectively at the World Sprint Championships, Pan Am Games and Goodwill Games.  Currently, I compete as a Masters cyclist.  Results include multiple state champion titles as well as 5th at the National Hill Climb champs. 
 
The older I get, the more tricks I try to hold on to the power, speed and vitality of my youth.  While I still feel like I’m a young buck, there are chinks in the armor which prove otherwise.  Volume is not an issue, but I am unable to train as intensely as I used to.  I can pump out the watts, just on a less frequent basis.  The body needs more TLC between hard workouts now than even five years ago.
 
I’ve also realized the growing importance of strength work.  Every year I hit the weight room, but invariably I cast the strength work aside anywhere from January to March.  This year was the first year where I remained dedicated to it without stopping.  And it made a difference; I just felt stronger and sturdier overall.
 
I learned a lot this year.   The main thing being this:  Be disciplined enough to pull back and insert more rest and recovery.  Through much of the Fall/Winter, I only biked four days per week.  I lifted weights three days per week religiously.  I cut back on the number of long weekend rides and complemented them with a second interval session instead.  Week-to-week, I felt great.  Rarely did I have a bad day of training and the upshot was that I could spread my recovery weeks farther apart, thus creating periods of more load before needing to back it off. 
 
The proof of this approach came in the annual kick-off to the Colorado cycling season, the Frostbite TT the first weekend in March.  In 2017, I won the Masters race but was nearly two minutes off the overall winner's time.  In 2018, I again won the Masters race, was 80 seconds faster than the previous year and finished only a handful of seconds behind the overall winner with the second-fastest time of the day; the overall winning time was near-identical both years.  My power was higher and I felt really solid.
 
Whether it is myself or the older athletes I train, I’m not convinced that the sharp decline starts to occur once we hit age 40.  Or even age 50.  We are part of a generation that will be proving 60 is the new 40.  What is critical as we age is to continue challenging ourselves, to not slow down.  It is imperative that we consistently work on sprinting, and VO2max and threshold intervals should be part of the training diet year round.  Strength training will help you retain muscle mass, and ensure your bones and connective tissue remain strong as well.  Most importantly, discipline with deliberate rest and recovery days will accelerate your recovery between workouts so that you can press hard when you need to.  Think of your workouts as an EKG readout – you need the peaks (hard workouts) and valleys between them (rest and recovery), because the alternative is a flat line.  And nobody wants that!
 
Getting older does not have to equate to being slower.  Eventually, sure, but later in life that what we are told to believe.  As you think about your own training plan, identify ways you can do things differently and more effectively.  Worry less about the vanity metrics – how many hours you put in, how many vertical feet you climbed, how many hard intervals you did, and so on – and instead focus on what will allow you to squeeze more out of what you do choose to do.  I can just about guarantee your results will improve with a refreshed approach and mindset.
 
Happy Training,
Coach Nate
0 Comments

When Our Expectations Are Skewed

8/6/2018

0 Comments

 
There is a lot of racing going on right now in some pretty hot, miserable conditions.  Ironman Canada temps were in the mid-90s.  The Tour of Portugal is seeing temps well above 100.  That's not only uncomfortable for a long day of racing, but also downright dangerous as the body's ability to keep itself cool is overridden by the heat.  Athletes are complaining of heat exhaustion and heat stroke-type symptoms, including nausea and extreme dehydration, and some athletes are weaving off the course and into ditches.  This is dangerous on multiple levels.
 
You want to be 100% fit and ready for your important races.  Sometimes that is enough; sometimes it is not.  Humans are creatures of habit.  In racing, this means we typically compete in largely the same races year after year.  This is how we choose to benchmark our performances, our fitness and our improvement one racing season to the next.  On the surface, this seems to make sense, but the logic is flawed.
 
"I just ran a 10k and my time was so slow compared to what I did last July on the same course." What was race day like last July compared to this July?  If it was 85 degrees last summer but 100 this time around, your result will naturally be slower this year given the same level of fitness.  And, not by just a few seconds; it could be a handful of minutes or more depending on how you cope with the heat.  For example, I can cope with high heat for an hour or two.  But, I've pushed myself over the edge often enough where beyond that I break down fairly quickly.  My heat tolerance is quite weak compared to what it used to be.  So, I do my best to minimize the health risk when I need to go out in the heat of summer.  For example, I will start a long ride at 5am so I'm only dealing with the rising temps in the closing 1-2 hours.  If it's a short ride, I don't worry so much.
 
Back to racing.  Sure, you can compare the same race year-to-year to possibly - possibly - gauge your fitness. But even then your performance is affected by weather conditions, and not just the heat. One year's Super Bowl Shuffle 5k might be greeted with temps in the 50s while the next year it could be 20 and snowing. You shouldn't expect a better or even similar result in less favorable conditions -- hot or cold, windy or calm -- but how many of us refuse to cut ourselves that slack? Not too many of us. 
 
Another trap athletes fall into is comparing early-season tune-up race results to those of key races when they are supposed to be 100% ready.  In this type of situation, maybe this will help you get through the winter and spring. Think of your training during this period as a slow and gradual progression that holds you over until it is time to turn the screws and get down to business. While it is true that you gain the majority of your fitness during the initial 3-5 months after a prolonged break from training (4+ weeks), you can still view your improvement curve as one that rises gradually now and then spikes in the weeks approaching your most important race(s). That spike is resultant from the addition of race-specific training that sharpens your fitness, smooths the rough edges and brings everything in your program together to a nice, solid peak performance. 
 
Now, that being said, I don't mean that you should simply dawdle along until next June. You can't afford to shoot your plan full of holes. But your resolve can be more relaxed and you can cut yourself some slack at this point. If you are too focused now, then you run the risk of hitting the brick wall called Emotional Burnout just about the time you should be getting excited about what you're trying to accomplish. Bad news when this happens. 
 
Training is the means to the end. If you're training faster than ever before in February, be careful. You may not be leaving yourself anywhere to go but down (meaning slower) when it really comes time to kick things into a higher gear next summer. 
 
So, cut yourself some slack!  Training is a means to an end, not the be all, end all.  You're trying to do the best you can and, typically, that's enough.  Sometimes it is not; and the factors which impact our ability to perform are sometimes beyond our control.

Happy Training,
Coach Nate

0 Comments

    Archives

    March 2022
    April 2021
    February 2021
    December 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

© 2015 Orion Training Systems, All Rights Reserved